Comments on: Logitech Z-2300 Speakers http://www.hqspeakers.com/logitech-z-2300-speakers/ Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:04:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Shannon O'Brien http://www.hqspeakers.com/logitech-z-2300-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-1541 Shannon O'Brien Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:56:21 +0000 http://www.hqspeakers.com/?p=432#comment-1541 Hi just wondering I bought the Logitech X-540 5.1 speakers a few years ago and didn't get the game adaptor cause I bought it off the show room floor, just thought you might have some any details on how or where to get one? Hi just wondering I bought the Logitech X-540 5.1 speakers a few years ago and didn’t get the game adaptor cause I bought it off the show room floor, just thought you might have some any details on how or where to get one?

]]> By: Rowan http://www.hqspeakers.com/logitech-z-2300-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-1201 Rowan Sat, 03 Jul 2010 07:41:32 +0000 http://www.hqspeakers.com/?p=432#comment-1201 I've just clicked on the "Logitech" button in categories and oh... my... god... What the hell are you doing!!! You don't have any idea what you are talking about! X-140 not Z-130. You called the X-240 an X-230 and the latter isn't made anymore. The X-620s are long gone and so are the Z-640s which you pictured. You also called the Z-5500 the X-530/X-540 as well. Did you just set up this site to confuse people? I think I will cry if I see the other brands' sections! WOW... I’ve just clicked on the “Logitech” button in categories and oh… my… god…

What the hell are you doing!!! You don’t have any idea what you are talking about! X-140 not Z-130. You called the X-240 an X-230 and the latter isn’t made anymore. The X-620s are long gone and so are the Z-640s which you pictured. You also called the Z-5500 the X-530/X-540 as well. Did you just set up this site to confuse people? I think I will cry if I see the other brands’ sections! WOW…

]]> By: Rowan http://www.hqspeakers.com/logitech-z-2300-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-1200 Rowan Sat, 03 Jul 2010 07:30:41 +0000 http://www.hqspeakers.com/?p=432#comment-1200 A rather strangely written review if you don't mind me saying. "Compatible with Windows 7" - well that's pretty obvious, since the system uses a standard 3.5mm plug it doesn't matter if the computer runs Windows 95 (which can play mp3s on 75mhz CPU and 16 megs of RAM) And the impedance / resistance is measured in OHMS not hours (lol) and you obviously aren't very technical because while that 8" Tang Band W8-670Q driver is rated for 180 watts RMS, the ST-Micro 25 wpc amp in the sub section is bridged for 50 watts RMS to the sub, not Logitech's fake claim of "120" and the other ST-Micro amp driving the 2.5" satellites is only 15 watts RMS per channel, not 40. The total power of this system is 80 watts RMS not 200 as a result of that. Same with the Logitech Z-5500 5.1 which is 5x10w RMS with 2x35w bridged for the sub for a total power of 120wrms not 505. A rather strangely written review if you don’t mind me saying. “Compatible with Windows 7″ – well that’s pretty obvious, since the system uses a standard 3.5mm plug it doesn’t matter if the computer runs Windows 95 (which can play mp3s on 75mhz CPU and 16 megs of RAM) And the impedance / resistance is measured in OHMS not hours (lol) and you obviously aren’t very technical because while that 8″ Tang Band W8-670Q driver is rated for 180 watts RMS, the ST-Micro 25 wpc amp in the sub section is bridged for 50 watts RMS to the sub, not Logitech’s fake claim of “120″ and the other ST-Micro amp driving the 2.5″ satellites is only 15 watts RMS per channel, not 40. The total power of this system is 80 watts RMS not 200 as a result of that. Same with the Logitech Z-5500 5.1 which is 5×10w RMS with 2×35w bridged for the sub for a total power of 120wrms not 505.

]]>